FOLLOW ME HERE
nell haynes
  • home
  • publications
  • projects
  • fieldnotes
  • teaching
  • contact
  • espaƱol

butter pt 4

5/12/2011

0 Comments

 
Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 5.
Perhaps reading the buttercow within its state fair context as Americana, rather than art, is what has kept it so sacred to ISF viewers. Its authenticity remains assumed, because it has not been removed from its specific spatial and temporal context. Though the notion of authenticity has been tossed around and contested by anthropologists in recent years, to go back to earlier instantiations of the term may be useful. Shepard suggests that we must move beyond the idea that subjectivity to market forces destroys authenticity. However, in this instance, the fact that the buttercow remains in its original context outside of the “art world” preserves a sense of authenticity for its enthusiasts and viewers.

Picture
Desai argues that “high culture” art objects are revered based on the aesthetic experience they provide, in ways that could not be achieved by a reproduction. The buttercow as well, is read as authentic because the context of the state fair is part of the experience of viewing the buttercow. It is an object that to many people is symbolic of home, family, roots, and notions of community based in actual physical proximity and personal knowledge.

Thus, much as Anderson argues the census, the map, and the museum shaped notions of identity and community, the buttercow stands as symbol of “us-ness.” Like the colonial map, it demarcates “us” from “them,” and acts as a logo, and becomes a “pure sign” or emblem for a certain kind of community affiliation. Its presence at the state fair attests to its authenticity, and to view the buttercow in an art gallery or other space outside of the agricultural milieu, would be to surrender it to the Other who cannot appreciate its intricacies, thus commodifying and degrading its form. 

Picture
Inside the Illinois State Fair Dairy Building. Photo courtesy of Dick Moore

Despite the dichotomy I have constructed between state fair and museum, Anderson’s discussion of the museum as a contributor to imagined communities is helpful as well. Anderson focuses on archaeological exhibits, rather than artistic ones, and presents the colonial museum as a context in which peoples were able to systematically study their history. Further, the state constructed museums with the maintenance of ideological structures in mind. As Desai writes, “Authenticity, whether cultural or aesthetic, is a notion that serves political interests.” The buttercow, as displayed at the state fair, evokes place-based pride and nostalgia in its viewers, (re)connecting them to the state (of Iowa, or Illinois), and the agricultural lifestyle being promoted within the fair. Much like the Monumental archaeology Anderson presents, the buttercow “allow[s] the state to appear as the guardian to a generalized, but also local Tradition,” in an attempt to revive prestige. 

But where the buttercow parts from Anderson’s examination of colonial iconicity is in the work of reproduction. Anderson writes that it was the states ability to reproduce the icon—exemplified in the postage stamp—was instrumental in the logoization of state symbols. The buttercow presents an interesting example, because in some ways it has been logo-ized. The 1993 & 2011 Iowa State Fair collectors' pins were images of the buttercow. And the Iowa State Fair edition of the Monopoly board game features a space for the buttercow. But even these commodifications remain on a small scale among collector-enthusiasts, and are not necessarily readily available to outsiders. These ephemera stand not as widely circulating objects, but as limited edition symbolic items that allow enthusiasts to perform legitimate claims to identities connected to the buttercow or fair [much like travelers’ collections of photographs and hostel bracelets].  Thus, even in the process of logoization the authenticity of the buttercow is not only preserved, but bolstered through the limited circulation of ephemera. 
 
Picture
Desai, Dipti
2000 Imaging Difference: The Politics of Representation in Multicultural Art Education. Studies in Art Education 41(2):114-129.

Shepherd, Robert
2002 Commodification, Culture and Tourism. Tourist Studies 2:183-196.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    themes

    All
    Aesthetics
    Authenticity
    Body
    Bolivia
    Chile
    Chola
    Class
    Disaster
    Drugs
    Food Studies
    Gender
    Globalization
    Indigeneity
    Inequality
    Lucha Libre
    Methods
    Migration
    Neoliberalism
    Performance
    Politics
    Protest
    Social Media
    Sport
    Tattoo
    Tourism
    United States
    Violence

    archives

    August 2022
    July 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    May 2016
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    March 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    August 2009
    July 2009

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.